If unequal outcomes are evidence of injustice, why are some inequalities considered urgent while others remain invisible?

Justice4All explores the blind spots of contemporary justice movements by extending their principles into areas where they are rarely applied. The resulting campaigns range from plausible to absurd, forcing viewers to confront a central question: Are we committed to justice itself, or only to particular outcomes that favor groups with social and political influence?

By pursuing familiar moral principles beyond their usual boundaries, the project exposes the tension between universal ideals and selective advocacy.